<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Metric Views &#187; Road signs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://metricviews.org.uk/category/road-signs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://metricviews.org.uk</link>
	<description>Commentary on the measurement muddle in the UK</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 20:54:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Howe calls for metrication progress</title>
		<link>http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/05/howe-calls-for-metrication-progress/</link>
		<comments>http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/05/howe-calls-for-metrication-progress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 20:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erithacus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Road signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridge strikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department for Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual-unit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metrication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weights and measures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metricviews.org.uk/?p=3091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lord Howe of Aberavon, the former Conservative Chancellor and Deputy Prime Minister, intervened in the Queen’s Speech debate on Tuesday to reiterate his call for the Government to complete the conversion of the UK’s weights and measures to metric units. &#8230; <a href="http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/05/howe-calls-for-metrication-progress/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/05/howe-calls-for-metrication-progress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fire hydrant signs &#8211; a successful metric conversion</title>
		<link>http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/05/fire-hydrant-signs-a-successful-metric-conversion/</link>
		<comments>http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/05/fire-hydrant-signs-a-successful-metric-conversion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 17:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>derekp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Road signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DfT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire hydrant signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metric road signs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metricviews.org.uk/?p=3036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Metric Views looks at a successful but unsung project that took place during the early years of the UK’s metric transition. We speculate what might have occurred had this job been the responsibility, not of local government, but of the &#8230; <a href="http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/05/fire-hydrant-signs-a-successful-metric-conversion/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/05/fire-hydrant-signs-a-successful-metric-conversion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transport for London raises the bar on vehicle signs</title>
		<link>http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/04/transport-for-london-raises-the-bar-on-vehicle-signs/</link>
		<comments>http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/04/transport-for-london-raises-the-bar-on-vehicle-signs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 23:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Road signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual-unit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metric road signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transport for London]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metricviews.org.uk/?p=2944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Metric Views is pleased to give credit where it&#8217;s due, and this week it is due to Transport for London (TfL) for raising the bar on the signage of vehicle restrictions. We have previously criticised the signing at the Rotherhithe &#8230; <a href="http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/04/transport-for-london-raises-the-bar-on-vehicle-signs/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/04/transport-for-london-raises-the-bar-on-vehicle-signs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DfT admits: no basis for blocking metric signs</title>
		<link>http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/03/dft-admits-no-basis-for-blocking-metric-signs/</link>
		<comments>http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/03/dft-admits-no-basis-for-blocking-metric-signs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erithacus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Road signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridge strikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department for Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DfT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual-unit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imperial road signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metric road signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metrication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metricviews.org.uk/?p=2898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After finally admitting they were wrong to try to withhold this information, the DfT have now published their analysis of the responses to their earlier consultation on the proposed phasing out of imperial-only height and width restriction traffic signs.  What &#8230; <a href="http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/03/dft-admits-no-basis-for-blocking-metric-signs/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/03/dft-admits-no-basis-for-blocking-metric-signs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Speed, momentum and resistance</title>
		<link>http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/02/speed-momentum-and-resistance/</link>
		<comments>http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/02/speed-momentum-and-resistance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ronniec</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Road signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metrication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resistance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metricviews.org.uk/?p=2668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which is preferable: a swift metric transition or a leisurely one? UKMA would have preferred the former. Successive UK governments have opted for the latter, believing that it carries less risk to their popularity. Ronnie Cohen assesses progress. Despite the &#8230; <a href="http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/02/speed-momentum-and-resistance/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/02/speed-momentum-and-resistance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FAQs about the transition to metric signs on UK roads</title>
		<link>http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/01/transition-to-metric-signs-on-uk-roads-faqs/</link>
		<comments>http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/01/transition-to-metric-signs-on-uk-roads-faqs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ronniec</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Road signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commonwealth countries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DfT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metric road signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metric speed limits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metrication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republic of Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[road safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worboys Report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metricviews.org.uk/?p=2599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Readers have commented recently on the obstacles to the transition to metric-only signs on Britain’s roads. This has prompted Metric Views to offer answers to some Frequently Asked Questions on this subject. In 2006, the UK Metric Association (UKMA) produced &#8230; <a href="http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/01/transition-to-metric-signs-on-uk-roads-faqs/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/01/transition-to-metric-signs-on-uk-roads-faqs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I became involved with measurement matters</title>
		<link>http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/01/why-i-became-involved-with-measurement-matters/</link>
		<comments>http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/01/why-i-became-involved-with-measurement-matters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ronniec</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Road signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metrication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metricviews.org.uk/?p=2592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of our readers has written to explain why he became interested in the campaign to complete Britain&#8217;s prolonged metric changeover. Ronnie Cohen wrote recently to Metric Views: &#8220;Out of all the bread-and-butter issues that top the political agenda, you &#8230; <a href="http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/01/why-i-became-involved-with-measurement-matters/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/01/why-i-became-involved-with-measurement-matters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DfT rejects industry view on metric signs</title>
		<link>http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/01/dft-rejects-industry-view-on-metric-signs/</link>
		<comments>http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/01/dft-rejects-industry-view-on-metric-signs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 13:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erithacus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Road signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridge strikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department for Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DfT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual-unit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imperial road signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measurement units]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metric road signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metric speed limits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metricviews.org.uk/?p=2566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department for Transport (DfT) has given in to anti-metric lobbying and backtracked on its earlier proposal that imperial-only height and width restriction signs should be replaced with dual metric/imperial signs within four years.  This climbdown is despite the responses &#8230; <a href="http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/01/dft-rejects-industry-view-on-metric-signs/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://metricviews.org.uk/2012/01/dft-rejects-industry-view-on-metric-signs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heading for the exit?</title>
		<link>http://metricviews.org.uk/2011/12/heading-for-the-exit/</link>
		<comments>http://metricviews.org.uk/2011/12/heading-for-the-exit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 17:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>derekp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Road signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eurozone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metrication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metricviews.org.uk/?p=2495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Problems of sovereign debt in the eurozone have seen the UK side-tracked in EU decision making, and, say some commentators, headed for the exit. Is this situation likely to impact on the UK’s stalled metric changeover? The editors of Metric &#8230; <a href="http://metricviews.org.uk/2011/12/heading-for-the-exit/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://metricviews.org.uk/2011/12/heading-for-the-exit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who should pay for metrication of road signs?</title>
		<link>http://metricviews.org.uk/2011/12/who-should-pay-for-metrication-of-road-signs/</link>
		<comments>http://metricviews.org.uk/2011/12/who-should-pay-for-metrication-of-road-signs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 23:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erithacus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Road signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department for Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DfT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imperial road signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measurement units]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metric road signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metric speed limits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metrication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weights and measures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metricviews.org.uk/?p=2463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department for Transport have claimed that converting road signs to show metric units would be an unjustifiable diversion of resources from other priority areas.  So is there an argument that the costs should be met from some other budget?  &#8230; <a href="http://metricviews.org.uk/2011/12/who-should-pay-for-metrication-of-road-signs/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://metricviews.org.uk/2011/12/who-should-pay-for-metrication-of-road-signs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

