<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tesco &#8211; trying hard but must try harder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://metricviews.org.uk/2007/07/tesco-symbol-usage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://metricviews.org.uk/2007/07/tesco-symbol-usage/</link>
	<description>Commentary on the measurement muddle in the UK</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 16:59:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Bladon/ SI Metric-Matters</title>
		<link>http://metricviews.org.uk/2007/07/tesco-symbol-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-17041</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Bladon/ SI Metric-Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metricviews.org.uk/2007/07/22/tesco-symbol-usage/#comment-17041</guid>
		<description>14 November 2008: Reply received from Tesco.

It fails to address the point of inkorrect symbols like: &#039;Kg&#039;.

It refers to advice from the Trading Law Department about â€˜using an authorised abbreviationâ€™ of the correct SI units on the productâ€™s label.

It says that for shelf edge labels â€˜the SI unit abbreviation is also capitalisedâ€™ to improve clarity for customers.

As far as Iâ€™m aware the International Standards Organisation (ISO) does not authorise the use of abbreviations for SI units.
For SI units symbols should be used not abbreviations.

www.simetricmatters.com     /  Philip Bladon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>14 November 2008: Reply received from Tesco.</p>
<p>It fails to address the point of inkorrect symbols like: &#8216;Kg&#8217;.</p>
<p>It refers to advice from the Trading Law Department about â€˜using an authorised abbreviationâ€™ of the correct SI units on the productâ€™s label.</p>
<p>It says that for shelf edge labels â€˜the SI unit abbreviation is also capitalisedâ€™ to improve clarity for customers.</p>
<p>As far as Iâ€™m aware the International Standards Organisation (ISO) does not authorise the use of abbreviations for SI units.<br />
For SI units symbols should be used not abbreviations.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.simetricmatters.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.simetricmatters.com</a>     /  Philip Bladon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Bladon/ SI Metric-Matters</title>
		<link>http://metricviews.org.uk/2007/07/tesco-symbol-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-16366</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Bladon/ SI Metric-Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metricviews.org.uk/2007/07/22/tesco-symbol-usage/#comment-16366</guid>
		<description>24th October:  I&#039;ve had no reply from Tesco.

Earlier this week I noticed on the the label for Tesco Pork Gala Pie (by weight): &#039;Items or Kg&#039;  and &#039;Price per kg&#039;.

www.simetricmatters.com / Philip Bladon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>24th October:  I&#8217;ve had no reply from Tesco.</p>
<p>Earlier this week I noticed on the the label for Tesco Pork Gala Pie (by weight): &#8216;Items or Kg&#8217;  and &#8216;Price per kg&#8217;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.simetricmatters.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.simetricmatters.com</a> / Philip Bladon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Bladon/ SI Metric-Matters</title>
		<link>http://metricviews.org.uk/2007/07/tesco-symbol-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-14693</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Bladon/ SI Metric-Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 08:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metricviews.org.uk/2007/07/22/tesco-symbol-usage/#comment-14693</guid>
		<description>23rd August
The Tesco staff responsible for labelling goods still havenâ€™t got the message that the correct symbol is â€˜kgâ€™, this is despite many complaints made over a period of several years. The complaints have been made within stores and in letters sent direct to Tescoâ€™s Customer Service Centre in Dundee.

The original blog item was written over a year ago.

Today, during a visit to Tescoâ€™s main store in Redditch, the price labels for potatoes had â€˜KGâ€™, â€˜Kgâ€™, and â€˜kgâ€™.

The Tesco Customer Service Centre has been sent another of their Customer Comments slips, which by the way are rather tatty.

&quot;If employees cannot be relied on to get the metric symbols right, then perhaps they, or their employer,Â need to consult my book (see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.simetricmatters.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.simetricmatters.com&lt;/a&gt;)Â or the style guide(s) produced by various organisations, including UKMA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>23rd August<br />
The Tesco staff responsible for labelling goods still havenâ€™t got the message that the correct symbol is â€˜kgâ€™, this is despite many complaints made over a period of several years. The complaints have been made within stores and in letters sent direct to Tescoâ€™s Customer Service Centre in Dundee.</p>
<p>The original blog item was written over a year ago.</p>
<p>Today, during a visit to Tescoâ€™s main store in Redditch, the price labels for potatoes had â€˜KGâ€™, â€˜Kgâ€™, and â€˜kgâ€™.</p>
<p>The Tesco Customer Service Centre has been sent another of their Customer Comments slips, which by the way are rather tatty.</p>
<p>&#8220;If employees cannot be relied on to get the metric symbols right, then perhaps they, or their employer,Â need to consult my book (see <a href="http://www.simetricmatters.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.simetricmatters.com</a>)Â or the style guide(s) produced by various organisations, including UKMA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Bladon/ SI Metric-Matters</title>
		<link>http://metricviews.org.uk/2007/07/tesco-symbol-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-14514</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Bladon/ SI Metric-Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metricviews.org.uk/2007/07/22/tesco-symbol-usage/#comment-14514</guid>
		<description>Obesity&#039;s big K

Recently the &#039;Cross Government Obesity Unit&#039; produced a document entitled: &#039;National Child Measurement Programme Guidance for PCTs: 2008/09&#039;.  In this publication it had the inkorrect symbol &#039;Kgs&#039; shown in a Results letter that would be sent out to parents and carers.

After writing to the Government department responsible (the Dept. of Health), I&#039;m not sure if the Minister (Alan Johnson MP) was made aware of this error.  However in the reply from the Customer Service Centre I&#039;ve now been told this error will be corrected.

How many more government departments are there where employees  don&#039;t know correct metric symbols?

www.simetricmatters.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obesity&#8217;s big K</p>
<p>Recently the &#8216;Cross Government Obesity Unit&#8217; produced a document entitled: &#8216;National Child Measurement Programme Guidance for PCTs: 2008/09&#8242;.  In this publication it had the inkorrect symbol &#8216;Kgs&#8217; shown in a Results letter that would be sent out to parents and carers.</p>
<p>After writing to the Government department responsible (the Dept. of Health), I&#8217;m not sure if the Minister (Alan Johnson MP) was made aware of this error.  However in the reply from the Customer Service Centre I&#8217;ve now been told this error will be corrected.</p>
<p>How many more government departments are there where employees  don&#8217;t know correct metric symbols?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.simetricmatters.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.simetricmatters.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Bladon/ SI Metric-Matters</title>
		<link>http://metricviews.org.uk/2007/07/tesco-symbol-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-13523</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Bladon/ SI Metric-Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metricviews.org.uk/2007/07/22/tesco-symbol-usage/#comment-13523</guid>
		<description>On the fresh fish counter at Tesco, Redditch, Worcestershire on 25 June 2008:-

&#039;SCOTTISH WHOLE UNDYED KIPPERS&#039;  the label on the counter had the inkorrect symbol &#039;Kg&#039;.  The label printed out after weighing showed:
 &#039;Items or Kg   0.365 kg&#039;   and   &#039;Price per kg    Â£3.59&#039; .

The fishmonger on duty was made aware that the correct symbol is â€˜kgâ€™.

SI Metric-Matters
http://www.simetricmatters.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the fresh fish counter at Tesco, Redditch, Worcestershire on 25 June 2008:-</p>
<p>&#8216;SCOTTISH WHOLE UNDYED KIPPERS&#8217;  the label on the counter had the inkorrect symbol &#8216;Kg&#8217;.  The label printed out after weighing showed:<br />
 &#8216;Items or Kg   0.365 kg&#8217;   and   &#8216;Price per kg    Â£3.59&#8242; .</p>
<p>The fishmonger on duty was made aware that the correct symbol is â€˜kgâ€™.</p>
<p>SI Metric-Matters<br />
<a href="http://www.simetricmatters.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.simetricmatters.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Bladon/ SI Metric-Matters</title>
		<link>http://metricviews.org.uk/2007/07/tesco-symbol-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-12534</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Bladon/ SI Metric-Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 17:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metricviews.org.uk/2007/07/22/tesco-symbol-usage/#comment-12534</guid>
		<description>5 May 2008  Southern Electric&#039;s &#039;KWh&#039;

Southern Electric&#039;s Booklet (# B1009 SE T2 APR 08) also contains inkorrect symbols.

&#039;KWh&#039; is NOT the correct symbol for kilowatt-hour.

It is extremely disappointing that a major energy supplier in the United Kingdom provides this wrong information.

 www.simetricmatters.com  (Philip Bladon)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5 May 2008  Southern Electric&#8217;s &#8216;KWh&#8217;</p>
<p>Southern Electric&#8217;s Booklet (# B1009 SE T2 APR 08) also contains inkorrect symbols.</p>
<p>&#8216;KWh&#8217; is NOT the correct symbol for kilowatt-hour.</p>
<p>It is extremely disappointing that a major energy supplier in the United Kingdom provides this wrong information.</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.simetricmatters.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.simetricmatters.com</a>  (Philip Bladon)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Bladon/ SI Metric-Matters</title>
		<link>http://metricviews.org.uk/2007/07/tesco-symbol-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-12050</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Bladon/ SI Metric-Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metricviews.org.uk/2007/07/22/tesco-symbol-usage/#comment-12050</guid>
		<description>Hoover&#039;s Big K.     Hoover must also try harder.

A few years ago I wrote to Hoover&#039;s Head Office in Merthyr Tydfil, South Wales, pointing out the inkorrect symbol &#039;Kg&#039; on the company&#039;s washing machines.
Today while visiting two stores (Apollo 2000 and Currys), the new Hoover washing machines on display still had the inkorrect symbol on them.

In the company&#039;s brochure, it shows specifications with the correct symbol (&#039;kg&#039;).  The problem is one picture shows a machine with: &#039;8+5 Kg&#039;, another picture has a machine  with: &#039;Mega 9kg&#039;.

(Brochure link:  http://www.hoover.co.uk/docs/images/brochures/2007/4660%20HOOVER%202.pdf  ) 

Perhaps eventually all Hoover&#039;s products will have correct symbols on them.

www.simetricmatters.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoover&#8217;s Big K.     Hoover must also try harder.</p>
<p>A few years ago I wrote to Hoover&#8217;s Head Office in Merthyr Tydfil, South Wales, pointing out the inkorrect symbol &#8216;Kg&#8217; on the company&#8217;s washing machines.<br />
Today while visiting two stores (Apollo 2000 and Currys), the new Hoover washing machines on display still had the inkorrect symbol on them.</p>
<p>In the company&#8217;s brochure, it shows specifications with the correct symbol (&#8216;kg&#8217;).  The problem is one picture shows a machine with: &#8217;8+5 Kg&#8217;, another picture has a machine  with: &#8216;Mega 9kg&#8217;.</p>
<p>(Brochure link:  <a href="http://www.hoover.co.uk/docs/images/brochures/2007/4660%20HOOVER%202.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.hoover.co.uk/docs/images/brochures/2007/4660%20HOOVER%202.pdf</a>  ) </p>
<p>Perhaps eventually all Hoover&#8217;s products will have correct symbols on them.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.simetricmatters.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.simetricmatters.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Bladon/ SI Metric-Matters</title>
		<link>http://metricviews.org.uk/2007/07/tesco-symbol-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-11926</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Bladon/ SI Metric-Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 16:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metricviews.org.uk/2007/07/22/tesco-symbol-usage/#comment-11926</guid>
		<description>22 March 2008 
Today I visited a Tesco store in Worcestershire.  On display were nets of &#039;Spanish Mandarins Ortanique&#039;, these were inkorrectly labelled &#039;1.5 Kg&#039;.

I pointed out to a member of  staff that there was an error on the label, she quickly spotted the inkorrect symbol.

Sadly the problem remains, someone at Tesco who is responsible for labelling isn&#039;t aware that the correct symbol is &#039;kg&#039;.

www.simetricmatters.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>22 March 2008<br />
Today I visited a Tesco store in Worcestershire.  On display were nets of &#8216;Spanish Mandarins Ortanique&#8217;, these were inkorrectly labelled &#8217;1.5 Kg&#8217;.</p>
<p>I pointed out to a member of  staff that there was an error on the label, she quickly spotted the inkorrect symbol.</p>
<p>Sadly the problem remains, someone at Tesco who is responsible for labelling isn&#8217;t aware that the correct symbol is &#8216;kg&#8217;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.simetricmatters.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.simetricmatters.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Bladon/ SI Metric-Matters</title>
		<link>http://metricviews.org.uk/2007/07/tesco-symbol-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-11704</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Bladon/ SI Metric-Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 10:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metricviews.org.uk/2007/07/22/tesco-symbol-usage/#comment-11704</guid>
		<description>Now Morrisons are inkorrect.  (7 March 2008)
A colleague has seen a Morrisons TV commercial which shows:
&quot;Â£4.29/Kg&quot; reduced to &quot;Â£2.14 per Kg&quot;.
Just to reinforce the point, the correct symbol for the kilogram is &#039;kg&#039;.
Using a capital letter K is inkorrect.

http://www.simetricmatters.com/inkorrect.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now Morrisons are inkorrect.  (7 March 2008)<br />
A colleague has seen a Morrisons TV commercial which shows:<br />
&#8220;Â£4.29/Kg&#8221; reduced to &#8220;Â£2.14 per Kg&#8221;.<br />
Just to reinforce the point, the correct symbol for the kilogram is &#8216;kg&#8217;.<br />
Using a capital letter K is inkorrect.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.simetricmatters.com/inkorrect.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.simetricmatters.com/inkorrect.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Pearce</title>
		<link>http://metricviews.org.uk/2007/07/tesco-symbol-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-8816</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Pearce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metricviews.org.uk/2007/07/22/tesco-symbol-usage/#comment-8816</guid>
		<description>Martin Vlietstra writes &quot;I regularly see comms specifications of 2 mbps when in fact they should be 2 Mib/s.&quot;

In data communications, a kilobit per second means exactly 1,000 bits per second (not 1,024), so you&#039;re seeing an error where none exists.

Computer memory is a different matter though - &quot;1GB&quot; is really 1.074GB, and &quot;1GiB&quot; would save any confusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin Vlietstra writes &#8220;I regularly see comms specifications of 2 mbps when in fact they should be 2 Mib/s.&#8221;</p>
<p>In data communications, a kilobit per second means exactly 1,000 bits per second (not 1,024), so you&#8217;re seeing an error where none exists.</p>
<p>Computer memory is a different matter though &#8211; &#8220;1GB&#8221; is really 1.074GB, and &#8220;1GiB&#8221; would save any confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

